The Lumiére Brothers, unlike
Edison who used his camera for recording staged performances, took the
camera into the streets of Paris where they filmed scenes from daily
life. In 1895, they produced more than 20 subjects including Workers
Leaving the Lumiére Factory and Arrival of a Train in the
Station. By 1897, Lumiére brother films were being shown on
five continents. By 1900 their catalog included 750 titles and the equipment
produced at their factory was being used around the world. At the Grand
International Exposition of 1900, they projected their films on a screen
measuring 99 feet by 79 feet.
|
In class discussions, we situated the work of the Lumiére brothers at the documentary pole of continuum that runs from filming of everyday life to highly plastic extremes that use lighting and dressed sets for purposes of enhancing visual pleasure. In the films of the Lumiére brothers the subject of the camera becomes the subject of our interest. Movement through the frame provides the primary means of visual pleasure. | |||
Carl Mayer and Hans Janowitz produced the original script for The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1919). The story is based on a combination of their experiences in the years before World War I, including newspaper accounts of a murder and rape in a suburb of Hamburg. The film language is "expressionistic," using painted sets and other forms of distortion to suggest the interior moods and tensions of the leading characters. According to Siegfried Kracauer (in From Caligary to Hitler), under the direction of Robert Weine, a film that may have taken a carnivalesque approach to the exploration of the human psyche became one that inscribed the middle class need for authority.
HYPOTHESIS:
|
The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari makes extensive use of film plastics to produce visual pleasure, pleasures that often tap directly into the unconscious field of desires that have been mapped by Freud. Most people experience the desire to tell a story that makes some sense of crucial or traumatic events that they have experienced. In the film, the narrator relates events that led to the silence and withdrawal of the leading female actor. The point of view represents the healthy masculinity of the leading male who has been witness to her trauma among other events attributed to Caligary. The narrator speaks from a position of understanding and moral authority. Weine's direction undercuts individual authority and places it instead at the institutional level of the mental hospital. In the final scenes, the viewer comes to realize that the narrator like the female lead is a resident of an asylum under Caligari's care. Where Caligary had been presented by the narrator as evil, he now becomes a kindly physician who (placing the original narration within a frame narration) explains the delusions that have beset the consciousness that we have been sharing throughout the film. The use of such twists of the plot line, using special effects and narration, to hold the viewer's attention, pitting evil against moral authority, originally developed in the expressionistic films of pre-Hitler Germany, have become typical of Hollywood films, especially those by Alfred Hitchcock. | |||
Sergei
Eisenstein's Battleship Potemkin (1925) in the sequence shot
on the Odessa Steps, provides the classic example of film montage. Rapid
cuts, shot and counter-shot, sustaining the narrative action and adding
a dimension of emotional excitation that is itself a source of visual pleasure.
Eisenstein's film is a fictionalized recreation of episodes from the 1905
Revolution in Russia. In the tradition of D.W.
Griffith's epics like The Birth of a Nation (1915) and Intolerance
(1916).
Griffith's films established the genre of the historical drama and like
most such films inscribes contemporary ideologies (including in Griffith's
case an embrace of the Ku Klux Klan in The Birth of a Nation). Extending
the
power of the history film through his use of montage, Eisenstein's
Battleship
Potemkin, inscribes a moment crucial to the founding ideology of Russia
during the first years of Stalin's dictatorship. |
The riveting effects of montage, produced in the cutting room and the seemingly authentic recreation of history in Battleship Potemkin return us our initial set of analytical parameters, those between documentary footage shot in the camera and those constructed effects that derive from editing and film plastics. Seeming authenticity is not disturbed and is often enhanced by shot/counter-shot editing. Visual pleasure we will see even normalizes itself to the hybrid effects of the jump cuts used by Jean-Luc Godard in Breathless (1959). | |||
|
In class we will conclude our examination of both documentary and hybrid effects by viewing out-takes from Dziga Vertov's Man with a Movie Camera (1929), Vsevolod Pudovkin's The Mother (1926), Leni Riefenstahl's, Triumph of the Will (1934) (all of which have a propagandistic dimension) and some examples of rock videos and commercial advertisements. |